About

Civil nuclear resilience, watched continuously.

Nuclear Risk Watch continuously correlates public hazard data — earthquakes, wildfires, floods, storms and conflict — against the world’s known nuclear facilities, and shows which sites are at elevated risk right now, why, and what changed. Every risk score comes with a plain-English rationale based on the hazard’s type, severity, proximity and recency.

It is built entirely on open, public data sources and is independent — not affiliated with any operator, regulator or government. Its scope is civil resilience and environmental hazard exposure, not military targeting, classified information or facility surveillance.

Project & attribution

Nuclear Risk Watch is an independent research project by Jay Allen.

Questions, corrections or data partnerships: xyio-dev@protonmail.com

How risk is scored

Each score (0–100, banded LOW → SEVERE) is the product of four interpretable factors, so there is always a clear reason behind it:

  • Hazard type — how threatening that class of hazard is to a nuclear site.
  • Severity — normalised intensity (e.g. earthquake magnitude, fire radiative power).
  • Proximity — influence falls away with distance from the site.
  • Recency — influence decays over time, with longer persistence for sustained threats such as conflict.

The picture refreshes hourly, around the clock.

Data sources & attribution

Hazard & event data

  • USGS Earthquake Hazards ProgramEarthquakes (public domain)
  • GDACSFloods, cyclones, droughts, volcanic activity — UN OCHA & European Commission (JRC)
  • NASA FIRMSActive-fire / wildfire detections (NASA EOSDIS)
  • Armed conflict — represented by curated, sourced entries; authoritative feeds (ACLED, UCDP) planned.

Facilities, basemap & imagery

Disclaimer

Risk scores are explainable estimates for situational awareness — not official safety assessments. Figures shown across the site are live snapshots and will change as feeds update. Imagery resolution from open sources reflects environmental context, not structural detail.

About · Nuclear Risk Watch